[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms |
|
Date: |
Sun, 08 Feb 2004 20:24:25 +0200 |
> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 14:45:28 +0100
>
> How about min-colors?
Okay, but what to do with the opposite clause, `ncolors<='? That
would be handy for color-challenged devices.
- supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Dan Nicolaescu, 2004/02/07
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/08
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Dan Nicolaescu, 2004/02/08
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Dan Nicolaescu, 2004/02/08
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/09
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Dan Nicolaescu, 2004/02/12
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/13
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Dan Nicolaescu, 2004/02/13
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/14
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Dan Nicolaescu, 2004/02/17
- Re: supporting more faces on 256 colors xterms, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/13