Re: Problems with latest CVS.

[Luc Teirlinck]

>From my previous message:

   It should be noted that neither the original version nor my patch
   automatically update a dired buffer in _all_ situations where updating
   might yield _some_ new information.

For instance, the patch does not automatically update for changes in
modification times for listed subdirectories, although it does update
for changes in modification times for listed _files_.  It does not seem
that the original updates for either.  In general, the patch seems to
update for a lot more information than the original.

Sincerely,

Luc.