[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Compilation to native

From: Matthew Mundell
Subject: Re: Compilation to native
Date: 24 Mar 2004 23:51:38 +0000
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50

Juri Linkov <address@hidden> writes:

> > I only wondered why the TODO entry favoured CCL, as it was simpler to
> > try the byte code first.  The changes to function calling required for
> > the compiled byte code would count towards a similar effort for CCL.
> As far as this TODO entry speaks about compilation, it is much
> simpler to compile CCL than Emacs Lisp.

Modifying the byte interpreter offered a simpler way to get going.

> And AFAIU, it suggests first to try compiling CCL bytecode to native
> code as opposed to compiling Emacs Lisp bytecode to native code.

It does: "Converting CCL programs to native code is probably the first
thing to try, though."

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]