[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: typo in frame.el
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: typo in frame.el |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Apr 2004 01:17:58 +0200 |
Whereas "iff" has been perfectly clear to me every time I've seen
it.
I always get confused with it, since it could be a honest typo for a
plain "if". Why not just use "if and only if", which is the meaning
of "iff"?
It is far clerer then "<=>" or any other funny ASCII combination, and
it also makes sense for anyone who is capable of reading some basic
English.
Cheers.
- Re: typo in frame.el, (continued)
- Re: typo in frame.el, Simon Josefsson, 2004/04/09
- RE: typo in frame.el, Drew Adams, 2004/04/09
- Re: typo in frame.el, David Kastrup, 2004/04/09
- Re: typo in frame.el, Simon Josefsson, 2004/04/09
- RE: typo in frame.el, Drew Adams, 2004/04/09
- Re: typo in frame.el, David Kastrup, 2004/04/09
- RE: typo in frame.el, Drew Adams, 2004/04/09
- Re: typo in frame.el, David Kastrup, 2004/04/09
- Re: typo in frame.el, Juri Linkov, 2004/04/11
- Re: typo in frame.el, Alan Shutko, 2004/04/09
- Re: typo in frame.el,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: typo in frame.el, Miles Bader, 2004/04/09
- Re: typo in frame.el, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/10