[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:12:05 -0500 (CDT)
I erased the CC'c in my previous message:
Miles Bader wrote:
The error message is different -- you're treating NIL as a
It seems to avoid calling Fget_buffer twice, you'd have to save the
value of base_buffer and use it in the error message.
Yes. The question is whether calling Fget_buffer is expensive enough
to justify another variable.
Re: make-indirect-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/04/13