[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compilation-highlight-duration
From: |
Tak Ota |
Subject: |
Re: compilation-highlight-duration |
Date: |
Sun, 02 May 2004 09:47:37 -0700 (PDT) |
Sat, 01 May 2004 13:51:05 -0400: Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
> New compile.el is very nice and I particularly like the highlight
> feature. However, the hard coded duration of 0.5 second could be too
> short or too long depending on the clock speed of the users' brain.
>
> What exactly is that .5 second delay used for? The code doesn't
> have many comments and I am not sure what job it is doing.
When `next-error' and `next-error-no-select' are executed the subject
line is highlighted momentarily for 0.5 seconds. The grep mode uses
`next-error-no-select' and this momentary highlighting plays important
role to inform a user where the match exists. The doc string of
`next-error-no-select' briefly touches upon the highlighting.
-Tak
- compilation-highlight-duration, Tak Ota, 2004/05/01
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/01
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration,
Tak Ota <=
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/03
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Tak Ota, 2004/05/03
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/04
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Tak Ota, 2004/05/04
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/04
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Kim F. Storm, 2004/05/04
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/04
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Kim F. Storm, 2004/05/04
- RE: compilation-highlight-duration, Drew Adams, 2004/05/04
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Tak Ota, 2004/05/04