[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never).
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never). |
Date: |
05 May 2004 11:24:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Luc Teirlinck <address@hidden> writes:
> I personally believe that the most logical thing would be to call the
> next release "21.4". The NEWS has always described all changes as to
> be made in 21.4.
The NEWS in CVS is read by developers. Nobody ever claimed that it
was a realiable document before the release.
> Skipping a number like "21.5" might confuse people and make them
> believe that there was a "21.4" which they somehow "missed". If a
> sysadmin updates to 21.5, I am sure plenty of people are going to
> believe there was a 21.4, which just never got updated to,
Well, if they believe that, where is the problem?
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., (continued)
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Richard Stallman, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., David Kastrup, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Miles Bader, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kim F. Storm, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., David Kastrup, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Luc Teirlinck, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never).,
David Kastrup <=
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Robert J. Chassell, 2004/05/04
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., David PONCE, 2004/05/14