[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS |
Date: |
Tue, 18 May 2004 20:45:37 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: 18 May 2004 11:13:47 -0400
>
> >From the ChangeLog text it seems that cmpiling with USE_LISP_UNION_TYPE
> would have caught that eons ago.
Probably. Alas, I have no resources to do such experiments with the
DOS port, unless I have a specific bug and a good reason to believe
that some non-standard switch will help me find it.
(I did compile with ENABLE_CHECKING, as you suggested, but that didn't
help to hunt this specific bug, as Emacs crashed in precisely the same
place as before. I then used GC debugging techniques described in
etc/DEBUG to find that Emacs was marking dos-unsupported-char-glyph
and barfed when it saw 127 as a cdr of a cons cell.)
Anyway, having to look for this bug was an ample punishment, as it was
I who introduced dos-unsupported-char-glyph years ago, and its
incorrect initialization is my bad.
> > Btw, is pure[] usage supposed to go up when USE_LSB_TAG is in effect?
> > AFAICS, it went from 977KB to 1019KB with almost no changes in Lisp
> > files since the previous build.
>
> There is likely to be an increase of about "2bytes * nb objects" due to the
> additional alignment constraint. Actually, most objects have a size that's
> a multiple of 8, so the extra alignment should only happen after allocating
> an array or a string, so it's probably more like "2b * nb arrays-or-strings".
Hmm... the last garbage-collect that is run at the end of `loadup'
says:
((48784 . 10021) (10244 . 0) (543 . 60) 69410 144160 (48 . 16) (17 . 12)
(4927 . 1814))
4900 strings is far too few to explain 40KB growth of pure storage, so
where else is the extra storage coming from?
(Should PURESIZE's value be enlarged when USE_LSB_TAG is in effect?)
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, (continued)
Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/16
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/17
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/18
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Andreas Schwab, 2004/05/18
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/18
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/18
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/19
- Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/20
Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/18
Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/18
Re: USE_LSB_TAG and MS-DOS, Michael Mauger, 2004/05/18