[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Function vectors: +funvec-20030516-0-c.patch
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Function vectors: +funvec-20030516-0-c.patch |
Date: |
18 May 2004 09:30:02 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
> BTW, this brings back a question you asked in private email a loooong time
Ah, glad to see you *did* receive (and read) it ;-)
> Working on this closure stuff, I now realize I can get rid of the special
> code and instead use a #[] closure that calls a special
> `call-interpreted-closure' internal function which just passes its args to
> the guts of funcall, bypassing the normal `resetting' mechanism. Essentially
> the same thing, but it gets rid of special-case code in central places like
> Ffuncall &c.
Yes. Your `curry' objects are extremely flexible indeed. That's why
I think an extra nil slow for some unlikely special case is
completely unnecessary.
Stefan
- Re: User-reserved element in byte code vectors, (continued)
- Re: User-reserved element in byte code vectors, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/18
- Re: User-reserved element in byte code vectors, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/16
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Function vectors: +funvec-20030516-0-c.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/16
- Function vectors: +funvec-20030516-1-c.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/16
- Re: Function vectors: +funvec-20030516-0-c.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/16
- Re: Function vectors: +funvec-20030516-0-c.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/16
- Re: Function vectors: +funvec-20030516-0-c.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/16
- Re: Function vectors: +funvec-20030516-0-c.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/16
- Re: Function vectors: +funvec-20030516-0-c.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/17
- Re: Function vectors: +funvec-20030516-0-c.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/17
- Re: Function vectors: +funvec-20030516-0-c.patch,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Function vectors: +funvec-20030516-0-c.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/17
- Re: Function vectors: +funvec-20030516-0-c.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/17
- Re: Function vectors: +funvec-20030516-0-c.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/17
- Re: Function vectors: +funvec-20030516-0-c.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/18
- Function vectors: +funvec-20030518-0-c.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/18
- Re: User-reserved element in byte code vectors, Lars Brinkhoff, 2004/05/06
- Re: User-reserved element in byte code vectors, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/06
- Re: User-reserved element in byte code vectors, Miles Bader, 2004/05/06
Re: User-reserved element in byte code vectors, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/02