[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: next-error-last-buffer
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: next-error-last-buffer |
Date: |
Tue, 25 May 2004 12:06:52 -0400 |
This problem occurs when going through results in a grep buffer
visits a patch file in diff mode. The next call of `next-error'
continues to visit places from a patch file, not from a grep buffer.
To avoid this problem, the variable `next-error-function' could be set
to nil in a buffer visited by the latest call of `next-error-function'.
This fix has a drawback; it will make that buffer permanently
incapable of being used as a series of references to places.
I think we should look for a way to disable this temporarily instead.
However, I am not sure how that would work--what would be the
condition on which to reenable this buffer's value of
next-error-function?
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, (continued)
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/24
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/24
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/25
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/27
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/27
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/28
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/28
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/29
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/30
Re: next-error-last-buffer,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/25
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/26
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/28
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/28
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/28
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/28
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/29
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/29
Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/25