[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: next-error refactoring
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: next-error refactoring |
Date: |
Fri, 28 May 2004 23:54:09 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Fri, 28 May 2004, address@hidden wrote:
> Yes, making [next-error] a minor mode with its own file would be a
> very useful thing!
>
> However, I think the name `next-error' is not right anymore when
> applied to non-`compile' modes like `grep', `diff', `occur', and
> possible future modes.
This was already discussed, and the *-locus and *-match aliases were
proposed.
I have no preference regarding the function names, but the *minor
mode* should be called next-dwim IMO. I can't think of any other
names that would fit the mode, as opposed to the function.
> Its name should clearly constitute its essence which is to visit the
> locations described in one buffer sequentially or in a user-defined
> order in other buffers.
Feel free to make suggestions, everyone :)
Ted
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, (continued)
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/06
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/08
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/09
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Kim F. Storm, 2004/05/09
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/10
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Stefan Daschek, 2004/05/10
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/28
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Kim F. Storm, 2004/05/28
- next-error refactoring (was: compilation-highlight-duration), Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/28
- Re: next-error refactoring, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/28
- Re: next-error refactoring,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: next-error refactoring (was: compilation-highlight-duration), Richard Stallman, 2004/05/29
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/29