[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: next-error refactoring
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: next-error refactoring |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Jun 2004 11:23:40 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed, 02 Jun 2004, address@hidden wrote:
> Yes, and I think maintenance will be easier if next-error
> functionality is in its own file.
>
> Why do you think it would matter?
It's easier to maintain a file when it has a single purpose.
simple.el gets modified a lot.
It's not a big deal though.
> next-error and related functions are just 150 lines.
> I don't want to split things into new files which are so small.
Understood, disregard my suggestion then.
Ted
- Re: next-error refactoring, (continued)
- Re: next-error refactoring, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/06/07
- Re: next-error refactoring, Tak Ota, 2004/06/07
- Re: next-error refactoring, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/08
- Re: next-error refactoring, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/06/11
- Re: next-error refactoring, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/12
- Re: next-error refactoring, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/06/30
- Re: next-error refactoring, Stefan Monnier, 2004/06/09
- Re: next-error refactoring, Juri Linkov, 2004/06/09
- Re: next-error refactoring, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/10
Re: next-error refactoring, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/02