[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Customize interface: The use of "boxed" buttons
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Customize interface: The use of "boxed" buttons |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Jun 2004 16:36:04 +0900 |
Per Abrahamsen <address@hidden> writes:
>> However you are giving the impression that you somehow think the `3d' faces
>> are bad, even if they were used a bit more consistently with the way other
>> use them.
>
> If all the points I raised were fixed, they would not be bad.
Er, they're already `not bad', though of course they might be better.
I'll look and see how simple it would be to fix some of these things
though (especially the mouse-over behavior seems kind of silly -- I'll
bet it was added just to show off the `mouse-face' property... :-).
You might want to update the sources you're using, BTW -- based on the
examples you gave, you seem to be using something several years old.
-Miles
--
"Though they may have different meanings, the cries of 'Yeeeee-haw!' and
'Allahu akbar!' are, in spirit, not actually all that different."
Re: Customize interface: The use of "boxed" buttons, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/06
- Re: Customize interface: The use of "boxed" buttons, Per Abrahamsen, 2004/06/06
- Re: Customize interface: The use of "boxed" buttons, Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/06/06
- Re: Customize interface: The use of "boxed" buttons, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/07
- Re: Customize interface: The use of "boxed" buttons, Per Abrahamsen, 2004/06/07
- Re: Customize interface: The use of "boxed" buttons, Miles Bader, 2004/06/07
- Re: Customize interface: The use of "boxed" buttons, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/08
Re: Customize interface: The use of "boxed" buttons, Kim F. Storm, 2004/06/07
Re: Customize interface: The use of "boxed" buttons, Kim F. Storm, 2004/06/07