[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Malformed interactive spec in replace.el
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Malformed interactive spec in replace.el |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:45:43 +0200 |
On 06 Jul 2004 10:35:45 +0200
David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> That's a result of the recent disruptive changes of Stefan that were
> seemingly checked in without discussion.
I don't know about "disruptive changes". I think in this case the
problem is something trivial, like a missing `progn'.
> Could we restrict ourselves to changes that conceivably work towards
> getting into a consistent state for the release?
This is an experiment: we're now trying to see whether we can "restrict
ourselves" into working to get a release out. Perhaps we can (and more
power to us), and perhaps we cannot, and then, other models (like
branching for a release and leaving the trunk open for people who wants
to do new stuff) would be better. It's a matter of group dynamics, and
much, I think, depends on the size and cohesion of the group.
But in any case I see no point in getting angry about the outcome :)
Juanma
- Malformed interactive spec in replace.el, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/07/06
- Re: Malformed interactive spec in replace.el, David Kastrup, 2004/07/06
- Re: Malformed interactive spec in replace.el,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Malformed interactive spec in replace.el, David Kastrup, 2004/07/06
- Re: Malformed interactive spec in replace.el, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/07/06
- Re: Malformed interactive spec in replace.el, David Kastrup, 2004/07/06
- Re: Malformed interactive spec in replace.el, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/07/06
- Re: Malformed interactive spec in replace.el, David Kastrup, 2004/07/06
- Re: Malformed interactive spec in replace.el, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/07/06
Re: Malformed interactive spec in replace.el, Stefan, 2004/07/06