Re: void variable

[Lars Hansen]

Luc Teirlinck wrote:

> In as far as the Elisp manual is concerned, what about the following patch?
Looks good to me.
However, it confuses me that autoloading of variables is mentioned twice.
So what about changing

+ If the @code{defvar} or @code{defcustom} itself is autoloaded through
+ a magic comment (@pxref{Autoload}), then there is nothing to worry
+ about: it is already initialized.  Otherwise, there are two ways to
+ prevent trouble.  You can precede the @code{defvar} or
+ @code{defcustom} with a magic comment, or you can @code{require} the
+ file before making the binding (@pxref{Named Features}).

to

+ If the @code{defvar} or @code{defcustom} itself is autoloaded through
+ a magic comment (@pxref{Autoload}), then there is nothing to worry
+ about: it is already initialized.  Otherwise, you can @code{require} the
+ file before making the binding (@pxref{Named Features}).