[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: void variable

From: Richard Stallman
Subject: Re: void variable
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:08:03 -0400

    The patch below seems to work well.  Any objection (or suggestion of
    a better message)?

It has to say what operation is reporting this message.
Otherwise nobody will understand why they would have expected
it to be otherwise.

So it could be:

   "defvar for %s did not work properly because it was locally bound"

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]