[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: void variable
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: void variable |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:08:03 -0400 |
The patch below seems to work well. Any objection (or suggestion of
a better message)?
It has to say what operation is reporting this message.
Otherwise nobody will understand why they would have expected
it to be otherwise.
So it could be:
"defvar for %s did not work properly because it was locally bound"
- Re: void variable, (continued)