Re: enriched-mode and switching major modes.

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Oliver Scholz <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:51:56 +0200
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> 
> But I have to start somewhere.  The tree interface to this kind of
> documents is well known and tested in practice.  Almost every
> specification talks about trees.  So if there are no principal
> objections to improving Emacs to better work with trees-in-a-buffer in
> the long run, I think that I fare better by assuming a tree-interface.

I simply didn't understand why you converged on the tree right from
the beginning.  I thought that the specification of the data structure
might benefit from some hind-sight discussion, since (at least in my
experience) trees are not very often used in ELisp code, oprobably for
a good reason.