[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

address@hidden: which-func-face is poor]

From: Richard Stallman
Subject: address@hidden: which-func-face is poor]
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 02:03:23 -0500

I'm not much of a font aficionado; I hope someone else will
think about this.

------- Start of forwarded message -------
X-DL-MFrom: <address@hidden>
X-DL-Connect: <albion.dl.ac.uk []>
To: address@hidden
From: Dave Love <address@hidden>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 21:58:03 +0000
X-CCLRC-SPAM-report: 2.397 : TO_HAS_SPACES
X-CCLRC-SPAM-bar: xx
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.37
Subject: which-func-face is poor
Sender: address@hidden
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (

which-func-format is illegible in the mode line on this LCD display
under X with a black frame background -- there's hardly any contrast
with the mode-line face.  It's also bad in tty mode, where it's not
much more legible in a blue block on the otherwise grey mode line.

I think it's better for it to default to default.  The defface for it
needs a :version, by the way.

Emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
------- End of forwarded message -------

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]