[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: utf-8.el

From: Kenichi Handa
Subject: Re: utf-8.el
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:47:32 +0900 (JST)
User-agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.3.50 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

In article <address@hidden>, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>>  Not acculate.  As I wrote above, (= l 2) implies it's an
>>  originally invalid byte represented by 2-byte sequence of
>>  eight-bit-graphic and eight-bit-control char.

> Oh, I think I'm beginning to understand: An invalid sequence such as "\201"
> is not translated into the single eight-bit-control char \201 but into
> a sequence of two eight-bit-* chars: "\302\201".

> Hmm... why is that?

As far as I remember, that is to distinguish an eight-bit-*
sequence for an untranslated char from that for an invalid

Ken'ichi HANDA

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]