[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: emacs -Q not documented

From: Andreas Schwab
Subject: Re: emacs -Q not documented
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:15:10 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:

> Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:
>> Well, -Q has definitely its merits, especially for reporting bugs.
>> After seeing this discussion I still think that my `--bare' proposal
>> is not that bad: The -Q options really strips off all features you
>> would normally like to have for daily work.
> Yes, --bare-bones or --no-frills seem like good candidates, too.

Since the option is primarily useful for debugging maybe its name should
contain the word debug.


Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]