[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: emacs -Q not documented

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: emacs -Q not documented
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:58:36 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:

> address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
>> Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:
>>> Well, -Q has definitely its merits, especially for reporting bugs.
>>> After seeing this discussion I still think that my `--bare' proposal
>>> is not that bad: The -Q options really strips off all features you
>>> would normally like to have for daily work.
>> Yes, --bare-bones or --no-frills seem like good candidates, too.
> Since the option is primarily useful for debugging maybe its name
> should contain the word debug.


This could also set debug-on-error.

David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]