[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:24:00 +0900
On Apr 7, 2005 10:55 AM, Luc Teirlinck <address@hidden> wrote:
> I propose the following doc change to comint.el. The reasons are
> the same as for the similar change I proposed to the
> shell-prompt-pattern docstring. I know of at least two modes, shell
> and ielm, that use `comint-prompt-regexp' even if
> `comint-use-prompt-regexp-instead-of-fields' is nil.
It might be good to mention shell-mode explicitly -- I think in most
cases where a derived mode does something like that, it also sets the
prompt regexp to something suitable for that mode.
In general, is this variable even a useful thing for users to
customize? Shouldn't they be customizing the corresponding variable
for a derived mode instead, as comint-mode is never used "raw"?
Maybe it should simply be a defvar instead of a defcustom.
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.