[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Incompatible change without "warning"
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Incompatible change without "warning" |
Date: |
Wed, 04 May 2005 18:04:31 -0400 |
There is probably no sense in declaring a variable an obsolete alias
if it does not even work!
I agree.
I think we should add a compatibility layer
with the old interface (can't be much more than three lines or so)
that we'll remove with 23.1 or so.
If a compatibility layer can be added, so as to make the old names work,
that would indeed be a good thing to do.
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", (continued)
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Richard Stallman, 2005/05/01
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/05/01
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Richard Stallman, 2005/05/02
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", David Kastrup, 2005/05/02
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Nick Roberts, 2005/05/02
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Luc Teirlinck, 2005/05/03
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", David Kastrup, 2005/05/03
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning",
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Richard Stallman, 2005/05/03
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Richard Stallman, 2005/05/02
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Richard Stallman, 2005/05/01
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Luc Teirlinck, 2005/05/01
- Re: Incompatible change without "warning", Richard Stallman, 2005/05/01