[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: crisp movement versus cua

From: Kim F. Storm
Subject: Re: crisp movement versus cua
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 10:07:33 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Kevin Ryde <address@hidden> writes:

> crisp.el seems to be still using cua--standard-movement-commands which
> was recently removed.  Eg,
>       M-x cua-mode
>       M-x crisp-mode
>       => Symbol's value as variable is void: cua--standard-movement-commands
> I only noticed this when trying some autoloads, I don't use either
> myself.  The new style is meant to be for crisp to set a property on
> its commands, or something, is it?

I installed a fix.  Thanks.

Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]