Re: vc-next-action not behaving

[Andreas Schwab]

David Abrahams <address@hidden> writes:

> Okay, emacs appears to have the right mtime, although I have to have a
> strange reading of the file-attributes doc in order to see it that
> way:
>
>  4. Last access time, as a list of two integers.
>   First integer has high-order 16 bits of time, second has low 16 bits.
>
> It's (17046 2788)
>
> If that's really meant to be a 32-bit number and 17046 means 17:46,
> there are some big gaps in numerical time. ;-)

No.  The number is (+ (* 17046 65536) 2788), which is 1117129444, except
that the number would not be representable as a Lisp_Integer on a 32-bit
host.

$ date -u -d @1117129444
Do Mai 26 17:44:04 UTC 2005

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."