[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Jun 2005 23:20:42 +0300 |
> Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 18:33:39 +0200
> From: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
>
> > + (WARNING: Do NOT use this suggestion if you have write access to the
> > + Emacs CVS tree and intend to commit changes to CVS. This is because -kb
> > + is sticky: it will be used in all future CVS operations on the files you
> > + check out like this.)
>
> Didn't we discuss this already and concluded that it wasn't a problem?
I asked a question about that, but didn't see any replies. All my
references, including the CVS manual, indicate that -kb will be used
henceforth with any CVS operation. If you (or someone else) know
otherwise, please tell the details.
> I know I've committed files from nt/ that I had checked out with -kb.
I never said that committing files will be impossible; binary files
can be committed as well. The question is, what does CVS think about
these files, and whether all versions have diffs associated etc.
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/11
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL, Jason Rumney, 2005/06/11
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/12
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL, Jason Rumney, 2005/06/12
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/13
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/18
- Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/18
Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/11