[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GC
From: |
Gaëtan LEURENT |
Subject: |
Re: GC |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Jun 2005 15:10:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (usg-unix-v) |
Miles Bader wrote on 25 Jun 2005 14:15:19 +0200:
> Yes I think that would be a good idea. Setting the cons-threshold to
> say 1 or 2% of RAM size would yield roughly the numbers which are
> being recommended (at 1%, you'd get 640K on a 64MB system, and 5MB on
> a 512MB system).
This is maybe not a good idea for people who runs emacs on a big server
with a lot a memory and a lot of users (my emacs is running on a server
with 8Gb of RAM -- 66 users are currently using it --, but wasting 80Mo
between each GC doesn't seem very smart)
--
Gaëtan LEURENT
- Re: GC, (continued)
- Re: GC, Adrian Aichner, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC, Miles Bader, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC, Adrian Aichner, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC, Miles Bader, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC, Adrian Aichner, 2005/06/26
- Re: GC, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/26
- Re: GC, Juri Linkov, 2005/06/26
- Re: GC, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/27
- Re: GC, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/26
- Re: GC (was: lists.texi), Miles Bader, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC,
Gaëtan LEURENT <=
- Re: GC, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC (was: lists.texi), Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC (was: lists.texi), Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC, Stefan Monnier, 2005/06/28
- Re: GC, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/28
Re: lists.texi, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/18