[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Sun, 3 Jul 2005 02:52:34 +0200
> There is an assq-delete-all, but I am missing assoc-delete-all ... or,
> am I missing something (else)?
If I had to guess, I'd say that is because `assq-delete-all' has only
one reasonable behavior, i.e., as it modifies the structure, you
usually are going to do
(setq alist (assq-delete-all 'my-key alist))
or directly construct the alist, filter it through `assq-delete-all'
and then discard it.
With `assoc-delete-all' you have to decide whether you want a shallow
or a deep copy, for example:
(defun assoc-delete-all (key alist)
(unless (and (consp (car alist))
(eq key (caar alist)))
(setq l (cons (car alist) l)))
(setq alist (cdr alist)))
will do what you want, but it will still share conses with the
original list. Other implementations can use `copy-tree' or
`copy-alist', but really, there's no one answer that is good for every
situation. Kent M. Pitman did a wonderful article about this issue (he
was speaking of copy) a long time ago: "The Best of Intentions: EQUAL
Rights--and Wrongs--in Lisp",