[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Editing exportet registry files
From: |
Gaëtan LEURENT |
Subject: |
Re: Editing exportet registry files |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:52:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (usg-unix-v) |
Jason Rumney wrote on 02 Jul 2005 00:12:53 +0200:
> Nonsense. It is very unlikely that UTF-16-LE-WITH-SIGNATURE,
> UTF-16-BE-WITH-SIGNATURE, or even UTF-8 will falsely match any Latin
> (or cyrillic or probably Asian) encoding. They should be at the front
> of the list.
For UTF-16 with signature, I agree, but UTF-8 could sometimes match a
Latin-1 file. For instance, "4×½=2" encoded in Latin-1 is valid as a
UTF-8 string. A friend of mine suggested "Try our new exclusive WAZA®
for just $0.02!" which is even meaningful in both cases.
--
Gaëtan LEURENT
- Re: Editing exportet registry files, (continued)
- Re: Editing exportet registry files, Miles Bader, 2005/07/01
- Re: Editing exportet registry files, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/01
- Re: Editing exportet registry files, David Kastrup, 2005/07/01
- Re: Editing exportet registry files, Jason Rumney, 2005/07/01
- Re: Editing exportet registry files, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/01
- Re: Editing exportet registry files, Andreas Schwab, 2005/07/02
- Re: Editing exportet registry files, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/02
- Re: Editing exportet registry files,
Gaëtan LEURENT <=
- Re: Editing exportet registry files, Jason Rumney, 2005/07/03
- Re: Editing exportet registry files, David Kastrup, 2005/07/03
- Re: Editing exportet registry files, Kaloian Doganov, 2005/07/04
- Coding system priority (was: Editing exportet registry files), Gaëtan LEURENT, 2005/07/03
Re: Editing exportet registry files, gritsch, 2005/07/01
RE: Editing exportet registry files, Dhruva Krishnamurthy (RBIN/EDI3) *, 2005/07/01