[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *"
|
From: |
Miles Bader |
|
Subject: |
Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *" |
|
Date: |
Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:13:39 +0900 |
2005/7/29, Kenichi Handa <address@hidden>:
> Such a cosmetic change will cause lots of conflicts in
> emacs-unicode branch. Could you please postpone it until
> emacs-unicode is merged?
That's probably the best thing.
[Though, probably I'm the one who ends up resolving all the resulting
conflicts!]
-Miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
- FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/28
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Miles Bader, 2005/07/28
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/28
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/28
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Kenichi Handa, 2005/07/28
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *",
Miles Bader <=
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/29
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Miles Bader, 2005/07/29
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/29
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Miles Bader, 2005/07/29
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/29
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/29
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Kenichi Handa, 2005/07/29
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/29