Re: mh-e/mh-loaddefs.el removed from CVS

[Bill Wohler]

Bill Wohler <address@hidden> writes:

> Zhang Wei <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> The lisp/Makefile.in has been changed to regenerate
>> mh-e/mh-loaddefs.el, but the corresponding lisp/makefile.w32-in remain
>> unchanged. Is that ok?
>
> I was unaware of this file, sorry.
>
> I'll patch the file and check it in.

Done. Can someone please take care of verifying the change and
implementing any "tricky bits" that Juanma mentioned?

By the way, MH-E is known to run on Windows so this is a worthwhile
exercise.

I noticed a few discrepancies between Makefile.in and
makefile.w32-in which may or may not be problems:

1. AUTOGENEL does not exist in makefile.w23-in, nor a maintainer-clean
   target which uses it.

2. compile depends on $(lisp)/subdirs.el in Makefile.in, subdirs.el in
   makefile.w32-in.

3. bootstrap in makefile.w32-in depends on "finder-data custom-deps"
   while boostrap in Makefile.in does not.

-- 
Bill Wohler <address@hidden>  http://www.newt.com/wohler/  GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.