[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: image size limit?
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: image size limit? |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:17:43 -0400 |
I think it makes sense for some purposes to allow max image size to be
specified in absolute pixels. Here is a patch to do that:
That is ok. But instead of this text
! If its value is an integer, it specifies the absolute maximum width
! and height, in pixels, for images. If its value is a floating point
! number, that number is multiplied by the width and height of the
! selected frame, in pixels, to give the maximum image width and height.
! Otherwise, no limit is placed on images.
it would be clearer to write this:
! If the value is an integer, it directly specifies the maximum
! image height and width, measured in pixels. If it is a floating
! point number, it specifies the maximum image height and width
! as a ratio to the frame height and width. If the value is
! non-numeric, there is no explicit limit on the size of images.
- Re: image size limit?, (continued)
- Re: image size limit?, Chong Yidong, 2005/10/16
- Re: image size limit?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/17
- Re: image size limit?, Chong Yidong, 2005/10/17
- Re: image size limit?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/17
- Re: image size limit?, Stefan Monnier, 2005/10/18
- Re: image size limit?, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, David Kastrup, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, Chong Yidong, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: image size limit?, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, Miles Bader, 2005/10/19
- Re: image size limit?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/20
- Re: image size limit?, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/10/19