[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Finish updating copyright years
From: |
Randal L. Schwartz |
Subject: |
Re: Finish updating copyright years |
Date: |
31 Oct 2005 08:26:09 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
>>>>> "Kim" == Kim F Storm <address@hidden> writes:
Kim> But take emacs/src/xdisp.c as an example. It is 23750 lines of C code.
Kim> Now, suppose I changed 25 lines in that file. So only a fraction of
Kim> the file is new creativity, but still I would update the copyright to
Kim> say (C) 2005.
And you would be wrong, according to my sources. You should change
that file to say (c) 2004, 2005.
Kim> We can argue about this issue forever, but if our lawyer says the
Kim> policy is ok, I'm ok with that.
And that's why I'm not arguing for change, just making sure I'm clear
on everyone's point and everyone is clear on mine.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<address@hidden> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
- Re: Finish updating copyright years, (continued)
- Re: Finish updating copyright years, David Kastrup, 2005/10/31
- Re: Finish updating copyright years, Nick Roberts, 2005/10/31
- Re: Finish updating copyright years, Piet van Oostrum, 2005/10/31
- Re: Finish updating copyright years, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/31
- Re: Finish updating copyright years, Randal L. Schwartz, 2005/10/31
- Re: Finish updating copyright years, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/31
- Re: Finish updating copyright years,
Randal L. Schwartz <=
Re: Finish updating copyright years, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/31