[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: describe-bindings: ^L, bad order, naming
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 21:48:14 +0200

> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 08:28:08 -0600 (CST)
> From: Luc Teirlinck <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden
>    ??? Strange logic.  If I print the buffer (I admit I never did that;
>    is there someone here that did?), why should I care exactly how many
>    printed pages will I get?
> Not to waste too much paper and not too wind up with too many nearly
> blank pages.

Never seen anyone who'd worry that much about this.

>    Do you really believe newbies will know about C-x C-q and
>    removing the page break?
> Of course.  C-x C-q is on the reference card

Ha!  I invite you to take a poll among newbies how many of them have
read the reference card.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]