[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad mailer Subject meddling (was: links in Help buffer aren't always
From: |
Alfred M\. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: bad mailer Subject meddling (was: links in Help buffer aren't always correct) |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:47:45 +0100 |
If it produces brain-dead subject lines, but it is a very common mailer,
maybe Rmail's C-c C-n could somehow deal with it by adding extra
intelligence to handle the retarded output ;-)? No flames please - I don't
even know what C-c C-n does,
C-c C-n moves to the next message with the same subject. What would
be nice is if C-c C-n (and C-c C-p) would move thread-wise based on
Message-ID, and then based on the subject.
On a related subject: Unlike the posts to emacs-devel, bug reports get the
original sender's email address (e.g. "address@hidden") prepended
to the subject line, as in this one (but I removed that). That makes the
subject much longer (m u c h longer, in some cases). Is that "feature"
really necessary or a good idea?
It happens when one forwards a message from rmail to someone (in this
case, emacs-devel).
- Re: address@hidden: links in Help buffer aren't alwayscorrect], (continued)
- Re: address@hidden: links in Help buffer aren't alwayscorrect], Kevin Rodgers, 2005/12/13
- Re: address@hidden: links in Help buffer aren't alwayscorrect], Kevin Rodgers, 2005/12/14
- Re: address@hidden: links in Help buffer aren't alwayscorrect], Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/14
- RE: address@hidden: links in Help buffer aren'talwayscorrect], Drew Adams, 2005/12/14
- Re: address@hidden: links in Help buffer aren'talwayscorrect], Kevin Rodgers, 2005/12/14
- RE: address@hidden: links in Help bufferaren'talwayscorrect], Drew Adams, 2005/12/14
- Re: address@hidden: links in Help buffer aren'talwayscorrect], Stefan Monnier, 2005/12/14
- Re: address@hidden: links in Help buffer aren'talwayscorrect], Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/15
- Re: address@hidden: links in Help buffer aren'talwayscorrect], Eli Zaretskii, 2005/12/14
- bad mailer Subject meddling (was: links in Help buffer aren't always correct), Drew Adams, 2005/12/15
- Re: bad mailer Subject meddling (was: links in Help buffer aren't always correct),
Alfred M\. Szmidt <=
- Re: bad mailer Subject meddling (was: links in Help buffer aren't always correct), Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/16
- Re: bad mailer Subject meddling (was: links in Help buffer aren't always correct), Eli Zaretskii, 2005/12/16
- Re: bad mailer Subject meddling (was: links in Help buffer aren't always correct), Eli Zaretskii, 2005/12/15
- Re: address@hidden: links in Help buffer aren'talwayscorrect], Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/15
- Re: address@hidden: links in Help buffer aren'talwayscorrect], Kevin Rodgers, 2005/12/16