Re: Why min-colors 88?

[Bill Wohler]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:

> >>> Can anyone explain the magic number 88 to me? Why is this used
> >>> throughout Emacs? Why is this the default generated when
> >>> customizing a face (on devices with lots of colors)?
> >> 
> >> Because there's an 88-color xterm whose color set is rich enough to
> >> support all the colors we use in Emacs' faces.
> 
> > Or in other words, Emacs' has 88 faces?
> 
> Well, 88 foreground * 88 background * 2 slants * 2 darknesses * a bunch of
> sizes * a handful of fonts (* 89 colors of underlining * ...) is slightly
> more than 88.
> Then add to it the fact that many faces are identical.

Whoops, I meant to say 88 different colors in all of its faces.

-- 
Bill Wohler <address@hidden>  http://www.newt.com/wohler/  GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.