[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tumme testing
From: |
Tomas Zerolo |
Subject: |
Re: tumme testing |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Feb 2006 07:18:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:41:13AM -0800, Drew Adams wrote:
[...]
> Small, Medium, Large.
[...]
> Quick! - which is bigger, Enormous or Huge? Such names are opaque on their
> own - users will need to look up what they mean anyway.
Ot1h you're right...
> Why not just use the size as the name, without adding the vague translation?
> "256x256" is a perfectly good name, and it gives you a clear idea of the
> size.
...otoh, a layer of indirection allows adapting to different screen
resolutions and user preferences with more ease. Personally, I'd prefer
the size names, to be able to change the mapping to real sizes as a
whole.
Matter of taste, I guess...
regards
-- tomás
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: tumme testing, (continued)
- Re: tumme testing, Juri Linkov, 2006/02/10
- Re: tumme testing, Mathias Dahl, 2006/02/11
- Re: tumme testing, Juri Linkov, 2006/02/12
- Re: tumme testing, Mathias Dahl, 2006/02/12
- Re: tumme testing, Mathias Dahl, 2006/02/12
- Re: tumme testing, Robert J. Chassell, 2006/02/12
- Re: tumme testing, Juri Linkov, 2006/02/13
- RE: tumme testing, Drew Adams, 2006/02/13
- Re: tumme testing,
Tomas Zerolo <=
- Re: tumme testing, Juri Linkov, 2006/02/14
- Re: tumme testing, Mathias Dahl, 2006/02/13
- Re: tumme testing, Mathias Dahl, 2006/02/11
- Re: thumbs.el and transparency, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/11
- Re: thumbs.el and transparency, Miles Bader, 2006/02/09
- Re: thumbs.el and transparency, Mathias Dahl, 2006/02/10
- Re: thumbs.el and transparency, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/10
- Re: thumbs.el and transparency, Mathias Dahl, 2006/02/10
- Re: thumbs.el and transparency, Juri Linkov, 2006/02/10
- Re: thumbs.el and transparency, Mathias Dahl, 2006/02/11