[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unquoted special characters in regexps
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: Unquoted special characters in regexps |
Date: |
Sun, 5 Mar 2006 11:04:06 -0600 (CST) |
Martin Rudalics wrote"
Luc Teirlinck wrote:
> If you consider in "[a]b]" the first and the second `]' to be _both_
> inside or _both_ outside the context of a character alternative, then
> it would be impossible to determine solely from that notion of context
> which of the two `]' has to be taken literally.
That's what I don't get tired of saying for one week already. You
always denied it by saying things like
I believe that you forgot to read the "If" that starts the passage you
quoted. Hence your impression that I was contradicting myself. I
consider the first `]' in "[a]b]" to be inside a character
alternative, the second one outside. From that context I can
determine that the first `]' is special and the second one not.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: Unquoted special characters in regexps, (continued)
- Re: Unquoted special characters in regexps, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/04
- Re: Unquoted special characters in regexps, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2006/03/04
- Re: Unquoted special characters in regexps, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/04
- Re: Unquoted special characters in regexps, martin rudalics, 2006/03/05
- Re: Unquoted special characters in regexps, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/05
- Re: Unquoted special characters in regexps, martin rudalics, 2006/03/06
- Re: Unquoted special characters in regexps,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: Unquoted special characters in regexps, martin rudalics, 2006/03/05
- Re: Unquoted special characters in regexps, Andreas Schwab, 2006/03/05
- Re: Unquoted special characters in regexps, martin rudalics, 2006/03/06
- Re: Unquoted special characters in regexps, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/05
- Re: Unquoted special characters in regexps, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/05
- Re: Unquoted special characters in regexps, martin rudalics, 2006/03/06