[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: diff-function face

From: Nick Roberts
Subject: Re: diff-function face
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:28:29 +1200

Stefan Monnier writes:
 > > Currently diff-function face inherits from diff-context and looks like
 > > its part of the diff hunk.  I presume this is a mistake as its really
 > > part of the header.  In any case I find a diff is a lot easier to view
 > > if diff-function inherits from diff-header.
 > I don't have much preference here, but just to give some context (pun
 > intended): I decided to inherit from diff-context because the function-info
 > is really just that: context.  Also, in many cases this info is useless
 > (because the naive heuristic used to find the function name works OK for
 > C but not for much else), so I'd rather have it be discrete.

Yes, thats a good reason for not using a face other than diff-context
or diff-header.

Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]