[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gud.el bug + patch
From: |
Karl Chen |
Subject: |
Re: gud.el bug + patch |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:57:23 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> On 2006-03-24 14:05 PST, Nick Roberts writes:
>> I found that having 'run' in .gdbinit triggers the problem;
>> this recipe should do it:
Nick> The mode works for you otherwise?
Yes, it works very well otherwise. I believe Emacs from 2006-01
worked even with the 'run' command in .gdbinit.
Nick> I can reproduce this bug. The problem arises because
Nick> the order of the initial annotations is not what Emacs
Nick> currently expects. I should be able at least to get M-x
Nick> gdba to work under these conditions. M-x gdb has the
Nick> added complication that it is used for both options
Nick> "--fullname" and "--annotate=3" and Emacs has to work
Nick> out which has been invoked from the output. Maybe at
Nick> some stage we can move the old behaviour (--fullname)
Nick> out to another command gud-gdb, say.
I guess it's more complicated than I thought; I got excited before
thinking I had solved the problem. Maybe you could use 'gdb -n'
to inhibit .gdbinit and then load .gdbinit after the necessary
Emacs gud-mode initialization.
--
Karl 2006-03-24 14:52
- gud.el bug + patch, Karl Chen, 2006/03/24
- Re: gud.el bug + patch, Nick Roberts, 2006/03/24
- Re: gud.el bug + patch, Karl Chen, 2006/03/24
- Re: gud.el bug + patch, Nick Roberts, 2006/03/24
- Re: gud.el bug + patch,
Karl Chen <=
- Re: gud.el bug + patch, Nick Roberts, 2006/03/24
- Re: gud.el bug + patch, Karl Chen, 2006/03/27
- Re: gud.el bug + patch, Nick Roberts, 2006/03/27
- Re: gud.el bug + patch, Karl Chen, 2006/03/27