[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Defining your own defun breaks find-function-search-for-symbol
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Defining your own defun breaks find-function-search-for-symbol |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Apr 2006 14:26:24 -0400 |
Any objections if I substitute
\\(\\w\\|\\s_\\)+ for \\w+ in find-function-regexp?
Please do.
However, would we want to rename the functions in this manner?
Yes.
It would
go against the namespace convention.
No, this is normal.
For example, when looking up mh-assoc-string, a definition with
mh-defun-compat would be considered. The advantage of this is that it
would work with any package. A disadvantage is this would break user's
settings of this option.
That is too far-reaching to be considered now.
Re: Defining your own defun breaks find-function-search-for-symbol, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/10