[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Problem report #60

From: Stuart D. Herring
Subject: Re: Problem report #60
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-11.EL3

>     So this is fine.  It'd be a big bug if t were 0, though, indexing at
> -1
>     like that.  Looking back up, it seems that if the while loop iterates
> even
>     once, t is > 0, but what if the while test fails the first time?
> Which while test is that?  Which line number?

The while test starts at like 8745 in the problem report (the loop ends at
line 9469).  t is incremented unconditionally at line 9338, and the
dangerous indexing/use is at line 9483.


This product is sold by volume, not by mass.  If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]