Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?

[Luc Teirlinck]

Miles Bader wrote:

   "Herbert Euler" <address@hidden> writes:
   >>     But if so I think the name 'max-specpdl-size' should be altered, since
   >>     normally a maximum value needs explicitly change, i.e. there should be
   >>     a particular function to change a maximum value.
   >>
   >>What would you think of specpdl-size-limit as a name for this?
   >
   > Yes it's better, since this name (in my opinion) is not confused.

   They sound exactly the same to me...

They sound exactly the same to me too.  I do not see any reason to
change the current name.

Sincerely,

Luc.