[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs doc changes
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: emacs doc changes |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Apr 2006 21:14:11 -0400 |
Is there a reason not to use unified diffs ("diff -u") when available?
When sending patches to me, I want diff -c format, not diff -u.
I find I cannot understand a diff -u patch unless it is very simple.
When I try to read the lines and think about what they do,
I cannot keep track of which lines are old and which are new.
- Re: emacs doc changes, (continued)
- Re: emacs doc changes, Giorgos Keramidas, 2006/04/19
- Re: emacs doc changes, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/19
- Re: emacs doc changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/20
- Re: emacs doc changes, David Kastrup, 2006/04/20
- Re: emacs doc changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/20
- Re: emacs doc changes, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/20
- Re: emacs doc changes, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/20
- Re: emacs doc changes, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/27
- Re: emacs doc changes, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/30
- Re: emacs doc changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/20
- Re: emacs doc changes,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: emacs doc changes, Jay Belanger, 2006/04/20
- Re: emacs doc changes, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/20
- Re: emacs doc changes, David Kastrup, 2006/04/20
- Re: emacs doc changes, Ted Zlatanov, 2006/04/19
- Re: emacs doc changes, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/25
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/15
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/14
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/14
Re: emacs-Xtra, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/13