[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PURESIZE increased (again)

From: Miles Bader
Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again)
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:35:05 +0900

On 4/22/06, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> I think we simply
> _must_ understand why on similar systems the numbers are so different

Why?  What's the _downside_ of adding a fudge factor to puresize?  Is
it worth the time to debug?  [On a modern system.]

It's nice to understand every detail, but sometimes it's not worth the effort.

Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]