Re: PURESIZE increased (again)

[Luc Teirlinck]

Richard Stallman wrote:

   If the numbers vary a little, that's not important in itself.
   But if they are very different, that suggests something else is wrong.

They are not very different.  They only differ by a fraction of one
percent.  Running temacs under GDB and putting a breakpoint on Fload
(as Eli suggested) just does not seem to work for me.  After byte-run
is loaded, pure_bytes_used is 76028 for me, which is less than the
79800 posted by Eli at the same point in temacs.  After that `c' in
GDB just continues, apparently completely ignoring the breakpoint on
Fload.

After bootstrapping, my pure-bytes-used is 1200904, which is
apparently less than the 1216528 reported by Eli.  Both numbers are
larger than BASE_PURESIZE used to be before it got increased from
1200000 to 1205000.  After that increase I no longer get the overflow
warning.

I have a few tiny uninstalled changes, but if these make a difference,
the fudge factor would really be to small.

Sincerely,

Luc.