Re: PURESIZE increased (again)

[Andreas Schwab]

Ken Raeburn <address@hidden> writes:

> No, I think you got that right ... the runtime process size and
> efficiency of heap allocation can vary a lot depending on the  libraries.
> But the pure storage in Emacs doesn't get allocated that  way; it comes
> out of a statically allocated array named pure[] in  alloc.c, which has
> its own allocation routines (pure_alloc and friends).

The padding used by pure_alloc depends on USE_LSB_TAG, which may explain
the difference.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."