[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Omission in tutorial
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Omission in tutorial |
Date: |
Sun, 07 May 2006 23:47:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> I just found that the tutorial does not mention the possibility of
> pressing C-h in an incomplete key sequence in order to list the
> possible completions.
This works for emacs -q, but when I try it with my normal setup, e.g.
C-x r C-h, the output is the same output as C-h b -- i.e. all
bindings, not just the possible completions.
I have yet to find the setting which causes this...
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Omission in tutorial, David Kastrup, 2006/05/07
- Re: Omission in tutorial, Burton Samograd, 2006/05/07
- Re: Omission in tutorial,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: Omission in tutorial, Richard Stallman, 2006/05/08
- Re: Omission in tutorial, David Kastrup, 2006/05/08
- Re: Omission in tutorial, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/05/08
- Re: Omission in tutorial, Stuart D. Herring, 2006/05/08
- Re: Omission in tutorial, David Kastrup, 2006/05/08
- Re: Omission in tutorial, Lennart Borgman, 2006/05/08
- Re: Omission in tutorial, Stuart D. Herring, 2006/05/08
- Re: Omission in tutorial, David Kastrup, 2006/05/08
Re: Omission in tutorial, Burton Samograd, 2006/05/08