[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default face problem
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Default face problem |
Date: |
Thu, 11 May 2006 06:40:30 +0300 |
> From: Kenichi Handa <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:36:20 +0900
>
> In article <address@hidden>, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> Perhaps, "#ifdef HAVE_X_WINDOWS ... #endif" is not
> >> necessary, but I can't test it on the other platform, and it
> >> seems that this problem happens only on X.
>
> > If you tell me how to reproduce it, I could try it on MS-Windows.
>
> I don't know the recipe for MS-Windows.
What is the recipe for X?
- Re: Default face problem, (continued)
- Re: Default face problem, Kenichi Handa, 2006/05/08
- Re: Default face problem, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/08
- Re: Default face problem, Kenichi Handa, 2006/05/08
- Re: Default face problem, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/08
- Re: Default face problem, Kenichi Handa, 2006/05/10
- Re: Default face problem, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/10
- Re: Default face problem, Kenichi Handa, 2006/05/10
- Re: Default face problem, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/10
- Re: Default face problem, Kenichi Handa, 2006/05/10
- Re: Default face problem,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Default face problem, Kenichi Handa, 2006/05/11
- Re: Default face problem, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/13
- Re: Default face problem, Kenichi Handa, 2006/05/14
- Re: Default face problem, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/14
- Re: Default face problem, Kenichi Handa, 2006/05/15
- Re: Default face problem, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/10