[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: delete-process bug
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: delete-process bug |
Date: |
Sun, 28 May 2006 23:15:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Michaël Cadilhac) writes:
> (Final ?) patch attached.
Looks good to me!
I wonder whether the pid should be added to deleted_pid_list if SIGCHLD is
not defined? In that case, it would be a memory leak...
But I also wonder if any of the async process stuff actually works
without SIGCHLD ?!? Are there any systems which support async processes
but don't have SIGCHLD?
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: delete-process bug, (continued)
- Re: delete-process bug, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/26
- Re: delete-process bug, Michael Mauger, 2006/05/26
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/27
- Re: delete-process bug, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/27
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/27
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/28
- Re: delete-process bug, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/28
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/28
- Re: delete-process bug, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/28
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/28
- Re: delete-process bug,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/28
- Re: delete-process bug, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/28
- Re: delete-process bug, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, David Kastrup, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Kim F. Storm, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/29
- Re: delete-process bug, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/28